Privacy is a major concern in the digital age. As more of our activities move online, vast troves of personal data are being collected, stored and analyzed – often without our knowledge or consent.
Blockchain technology offers a decentralized and transparent system for transactions and data storage. However, public blockchains also pose privacy risks as anyone can view transaction histories.
This is where an emerging technology called zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) comes in. ZKPs allow users to validate information and transactions without having to reveal the underlying data.
Let‘s explore how ZKPs work, their applications in blockchain, benefits, limitations, and the future outlook for this important privacy-enhancing tool.
What Are Zero Knowledge Proofs?
A zero-knowledge proof allows one party (the prover) to convince another party (the verifier) that a statement is true without conveying any additional information apart from the fact that the statement is indeed true.
For example, you could prove to your friend that you know the passcode to a bank vault without actually disclosing the passcode. In cryptography terms:
- The prover possesses some secret information
- The verifier wants confirmation that the prover has this info
- Using ZKPs, the prover can satisfy the verifier without revealing their secret
ZKPs have some key properties:
- Completeness – If the statement is true, an honest verifier will be convinced by an honest prover
- Soundness – If the statement is false, no dishonest prover can convince the honest verifier
- Zero-knowledge – The verifier learns nothing beyond the truth of the statement
There are two main types of ZKPs:
- Interactive – Multiple back and forth challenges between prover and verifier
- Non-interactive – Single proof that anyone can verify
Now let‘s look under the hood to understand how ZKPs work before exploring some blockchain applications.
How Do Zero Knowledge Proofs Work?
While quite complex mathematically, the essence of ZKPs lies in computationally challenging problems that are easy to verify but difficult to solve. They typically rely on cryptographic hash functions and proofs.
Here is a simplified example:
- Alice wishes to prove to Bob that she knows the solution to a complex math problem without revealing the actual solution
- Bob generates a random "challenge" composite number and sends it to Alice
- Alice uses her solution to factor the number into its primes
- She responds with the primes to Bob
- Since prime factorization is easy to verify but hard to compute, this convincingly proves to Bob that Alice has the solution without revealing it
The security of the entire scheme lies in the immense computational difficulty of factoring large composite numbers.
ZKPs involve multiple rounds of such challenges using mathematical algorithms that are simple for a prover who knows the secret but virtually impossible for a prover who doesn‘t.
This moves the proof into the realm of computational security. While not mathematically foolproof, it crosses a threshold of computational difficulty that renders false proofs intractable.
The Math Behind Zero Knowledge Proofs
While the previous example gives an overview, under the hood zero knowledge proofs rely on advanced and often novel cryptography and mathematic techniques still being researched and refined.
Commitment Schemes
ZKPs depend heavily on cryptographic commitments which allow a prover to commit to a chosen value while keeping it hidden, with the ability to later reveal the committed value. This verifies the original commitment.
Zero-Knowledge Arguments
In contrast to proofs which offer absolute security, zero-knowledge arguments rely on computational assumptions for security. But arguments satisfy the zero knowledge properties and offer probabilistic soundness.
Probabilistically Checkable Proofs (PCPs)
PCPs involve generating a proof such that the verifier only needs to query a small part of the overall proof in order to check its validity, keeping the proof succinct.
Elliptic Curve Cryptography
The hardness of elliptic curve discrete logarithm problems enable one-way trapdoor functions that are simple to perform yet difficult to invert. This allows easy proof generation and verification but makes forging fake proofs tough.
Formal Proofs
Math-based formal proofs using logic theory ensure the security properties of protocol hold within a model that can be programmatically checked by software tools.
These pure mathematical foundations ultimately get integrated into the protocols powering zero knowledge proof systems.
Now let‘s explore some key areas where ZKPs provide major benefits in blockchain-based systems.
ZKP Use Cases in Blockchain
Zero knowledge proofs offer a slew of benefits for security, privacy and scalability in blockchain applications including:
Anonymous Transactions
Hiding transaction details like sender, recipient and amount enhances privacy. Users can transact trustlessly without publicly exposing their activities or identities on the blockchain.
Example – Zcash uses ZKPs for shielded transactions that obscure key details but still enable validation on its public blockchain.
Secure Messaging
Messages end-to-end encrypted for privacy can utilize ZKPs for identity verification without revealing user details to the messaging servers.
Identity and Credential Verification
Users can prove credentials like payments, legal documents, qualifications, etc. without revealing the actual sensitive records.
Example – Planned digital ID systems can leverage ZKPs for privacy-preserving identity checks.
Voting Systems
ZKP enables private and verifiable e-voting on public blockchains. Voters can validate their eligibility and confirm their vote was counted without exposing who/what they voted for.
Data Privacy
For health records, financial data and other confidential on-chain data sets, ZKPs help validate information without users having to reveal actual data.
In these and more use cases, ZKPs act as a privacy and security layer operating seamlessly with public blockchains to expand functionality.
Evolution of Zero Knowledge Proof Systems
While proposed decades ago, only recent cryptographic advancements have brought ZK proofs systems close to practical application:
ZK-SNARKs
First evolved construction of ZKPs using elliptic curves laid foundation but with large proof sizes and need for trusted setup ceremony.
ZK-STARKs
Significant evolution thanks to advances in probabilistically checkable proofs brought smaller proof sizes and no need for trusted setup.
This table compares two prominent constructions:
| Metric | ZK-SNARKs | ZK-STARKs |
|---|---|---|
| Proof Sizes | Large | Small |
| Verification Time | Fast | Slower |
| Computational Assumptions | Elliptic Curves | Collision-Resistant Hash |
| Trusted Setup | Yes | No |
| Quantum Resistant | No | Yes |
As research continues, new constructions like PLONK offer chances to optimize different metrics from proof size to verification speed, cementing ZKPs role as a privacy layer for blockchain.
Real-World Analogies
While the math behind zero knowledge proofs is complex, several analogies can help clarify how ZKPs work:
Magic Trick Analogy
A magician performs a card trick that appears impossible without magic. However they use ZKP mechanisms privately to convince observers they actually plucked a named card seemingly impossibly. Observers can repeatedly verify the correctness of the trick without ever learning how it was performed.
You Can‘t Get There From Here Analogy
When asking for directions, you‘re told "You can‘t get there from here" without helpful directions. But someone else demonstrates they‘ve been to this hard-to-reach place using specific challenge-response interactions with you. This serves as proof of their obscure knowledge without conveying the actual complex directions.
Playing Cards Analogy
Consider a card game where one player needs to verify whether another player possesses a straight flush without seeing their cards. Shuffling, cutting, permutations verified through back-and-forth interactions can establish this truth without revealing the actual hand.
These demonstrates how ZKPs replicate elements of the real world related to verification of hidden information or improbable feats in an analogy to crystalline cryptographic constructions.
Now let‘s analyze some metrics for understanding performance of ZKP schemes…
ZKP System Benchmarks
While still largely experimental, benchmarking zero knowledge proof systems even at prototype stages is vital for continued progress and adoption:
Proof Sizes
Measuring actual on-chain proof size lengths gives indication of transactional overhead and storage needs dependent on type of network. Smaller is generally better.
Verification Times
Long proof verification hinders performance gains from parallel batch verification critical to high scalability. Sub-second verification better for user experience.
Computational Complexity
Estimating cryptographic operations involved in proving and verifying yields insights into real-world efficiency. Lower gas costs and energy usage improves sustainability.
By benchmarking metrics like:
- Proof length
- Verification CPU time
- Computational complexity
- Main memory usage
Developers can properly assess tradeoffs and optimizations between different ZKP constructions for intended use cases.
Limitations of Zero Knowledge Proofs
While highly promising, certain limitations still remain around ZK proofs adoption:
No Standardization
Lack of standards between various proof systems hampers interoperability. But bodies like the Decentralized Identity Foundation, W3C and more are helping align research efforts.
Computational Overhead
Despite massive efficiency improvements, resource-intensive cryptographic operations increase costs which protocols aim to mitigate via optimizations.
User Experience
Abstruse underlying math makes application integration less seamless. But tools, libraries and platforms hide complexity allowing developers to build zero-knowledge apps more easily.
Thankfully diverse initiatives actively aim to solve these adoption barriers including:
Cryptoeconomics
Incentive schemes provide financial rewards to participants for performing costly computations needed by network.
Trusted Execution Environments
Leveraging secure enclaves in hardware like Intel SGX allows portions of sensitive computations to run efficently off-chain.
Specialized Hardware
FPGA and ASIC solutions developed specifically for accelerated zero knowledge proof computations and verifications are emerging.
By combining cutting-edge research with economic and hardware solutions, ZKP limitations are being steadily addressed ushering the way for real-world decentralized deployments.
Comparing Zero Knowledge Proofs to Related Privacy Technologies
While overlapping on some aspects with zero knowledge proofs, related privacy technologies have some distinctions:
Multiparty Computation
Enables multiple parties to jointly compute function results from their respective secret inputs without leaking those inputs to other parties.
Homomorphic Encryption
Allows computations to be carried out on encrypted data without requiring decryption thus keeping data private.
Zero Trust Security
Validates every access request and denies by default to minimize exposure of confidential apps/data in enterprise environments.
While multiparty computation and homomorphic encryption offer alternate paradigms for privacy-preserving computations, Zero Trust provides permissions layer for enterprise cybersecurity.
Now let‘s explore some promising blockchain projects leveraging zero knowledge proofs…
Promising Blockchain Projects Using ZKPs
Several major blockchain initiatives are leveraging zero knowledge proofs, including:
Zcash – Privacy-focused payments blockchain productionizing ZKPs for anonymous digital currency transactions
Polygon – Scaling solution using ZK rollups to boost throughput and lower fees on Ethereum
Manta Network – Building ZKP-powered decentralized finance apps including private decentralize exchange MantaPay
Celo – Mobile-oriented blockchain using ZKPs for private stablecoin payments via Valora wallet
Filecoin – Decentralized storage network using ZKPs to validate replicated file storage proofs
zkSync – ZK-rollup-based Layer 2 scaling protocol to reduce costs and improve speeds on Ethereum
Loopring – ZKRollup exchange protocol enabling fast, cheap trades by batching and proving transactions off-chain
Aztec – Bringing privacy, speed and low costs to DeFi ecosystems via ZK proofs for anonymous transactions
As zero knowledge technology matures and gets implemented across Layer 1 chains and Layer 2 scaling solutions, we can expect more real-world traction.
Now let‘s examine enterprise adoption and implications of zero knowledge proofs…
Enterprise Zero Knowledge Proof Use Cases
While most mature use cases are still within the blockchain/cryptocurrency space currently, areas like finance, healthcare and public sector hold immense potential for ZKP adoption:
Finance
Verify assets/income for loan approvals, real-time audits, regulatory reporting across banking, insurance and capital markets by revealing only necessary statements under strict privacy controls.
Healthcare
Enable privacy-preserving sharing of medical records across providers, researchers, regulators needing varying level data access without exposing personal patient information.
Public Sector
Allow citizens to securely prove identity, residency, eligibility for government services through ZK proofs to prevent fraud and enhance delivery programs.
As enterprise appetite for confidential computing grows in high-risk settings like these, zero knowledge proofs offer the ability to trustlessly validate information without compromising sensitive data through decentralization.
Initial testing in sandbox environments will pave way for large-scale confidential computing through ZK proofs across enterprises.
Looking Ahead for Zero Knowledge Proofs
Zero knowledge proofs are among the most promising privacy techniques with any number of applications from anonymous transactions for individuals to confidential computing among organizations.
Widespread production deployments are still in early stages though as computational workload, standardization and user experience remain barriers. But constant innovation and projects like zkSync, Loopring, Aztec making steady progress on ZKP research that translates to implementation.
As blockchain adoption increases, demand for privacy and security guarantees will drive interest in ZK proofs to new levels. Further mathematical and cryptographic advances will proliferate development.
Here are some key trends that will shape the future of zero knowledge proofs:
Quantum Computing
Most ZKPs remain vulnerable to future quantum algorithms which underscores the importance of quantum-resistant constructions still needing standardization.
Proof Verification
Optimizing proof verification complexity and costs are vital technical priorities, especially for efficient blockchain consensus and scaling.
Holistic Privacy
Integrating ZK proofs as part of broader confidential computing tech stacks blending encryption, access controls, hardware security etc.
Regulatory Landscape
Policymaker perspectives growing more favorable given alignment with privacy laws like GDPR will encourage adoption across sectors.
So while current ZKP applications might seem like proofs-of-concept today, in the near future zero knowledge proofs promise to deliver privacy, security and functionality toward mainstream blockchain adoption across industries.
%20in%20Blockchain%20Explained){kind=link}